Council Praises Corporate Tax Break, Targets Student Rentals During Work Session
Towson, Maryland. — Baltimore County administration officials and council members spent the majority of a Tuesday work session rallying support for a 50-year tax break for a massive industrial project, while also advancing measures to restrict student housing and exempt a specific developer from county fees.
The December 9th meeting served as the final public discussion before expected votes on these controversial measures next week.
“No-Brainer” Tax Deal for Sparrows Point
The centerpiece of the session was Bill 88-25, legislation that would grant a 50-year “Payment in Lieu of Taxes” (PILOT) agreement to the developers of the Sparrows Point Container Terminal. The project, a joint venture between Tradepoint Atlantic and shipping giant MSC, is estimated to cost $1.2 billion.
Councilman Julian Jones (District 4) was a vocal proponent of the deal, calling the tax arrangement a “no-brainer” due to the potential for job creation.
However, the terms of the deal drew sharp criticism from residents. Alexander Pappas testified that the agreement effectively shifts long-term financial risk onto taxpayers. Pappas noted that while the tax break for the corporation is “numerical, exact, non-fungible, and ironclad,” the promised economic benefits rely on speculative projections.
Deputy Chief Administrative Officer Samir Sidh defended the proposal, arguing that while the terminal itself might generate a net revenue loss of $3.4 million compared to other potential land uses, the broader economic activity would yield over $500 million in gross revenue over the next half-century.
Crackdown on Student Rentals
Council Chairman Michael Ertel (District 6) introduced Bill 92-25, a “pilot program” designed to limit the density of rental housing in neighborhoods surrounding Towson University.
Ertel argued the legislation is necessary to protect the county’s income tax base, claiming that student renters do not contribute to local revenue in the same way as permanent residents. He also cited quality-of-life complaints regarding trash and noise.
Industry representatives raised concerns about the bill’s implementation. Pete Gutwald testified that vague definitions regarding “temporary housing” and license caps could create legal confusion and unfairly penalize property owners.
Developer Fee Waiver Confirmed
In a brief but revealing exchange, officials discussed Bill 93-25, a measure to exempt certain affordable housing projects from development impact fees.
Chairman Ertel admitted the bill was drafted to address a specific financial hurdle for a development in Rosedale, confirming that the legislation is a retroactive fix for a single project rather than a broad policy initiative. By waiving these fees, the county forgoes revenue normally used to fund public infrastructure like schools and roads.
Uncapped Contracts Continue
The session also touched on procurement strategies, with officials defending the practice of awarding contracts to low bidders who may not ultimately perform the work. This discussion highlights ongoing concerns about the county’s management of “on-call” contracts that lack strict spending caps.
The County Council is scheduled to take final votes on these measures at today’s December 15 Legislative Session.
Source: December 9, 2025 Work Session
This video contains the full work session recording, including the key discussions on tax credits and housing bills cited in the article.
Like what we’re doing? Donate to the Baltimore Informer here.
